Employee fairly dismissed despite procedural defects
A fairly conducted appeal is capable of remedying even serious procedural defects in the first part of a disciplinary process.
A fairly conducted appeal is capable of remedying even serious procedural defects in the first part of a disciplinary process.
If a client instructs that an employee be removed from working on its contract which is set to transfer under TUPE, that employee will still transfer if the outgoing employer decides not to heed the instruction.
Peripatetic workers are considered ‘at work’ when travelling between their homes and assignments given to them by their employer.
An employee does not have an implied duty to disclose to his employer allegations made against him whilst working elsewhere.
The dismissal of a Christian employee who expressed negative views in respect of her colleague’s homosexual lifestyle was held to be discriminatory.
In the absence of evidence suggesting that an employee is unable to do his job, it was unreasonable for an employer to dismiss an employee for coming to work whilst smelling of alcohol.
An employer’s request that a Muslim employee wear a shorter jilbab for health and safety reasons was held not to be discriminatory.
The charity Public Concern at Work has found that whistleblowers are not being adequately protected under the current legal regime.
Andrew Bailey, Chief Executive of the Prudential Regulation Authority, has recommended that firms amend staff contracts so as to ensure compliance with the European Banking Authority’s report on the use of role-based allowances to contravene the EU bonus cap.
An employer has been granted an interim injunction restraining its former employees’ use of confidential information and intellectual property at a competitor. However, it has limited those restraints so as not to cause harm to a customer.
A disclosure does not need to be in the interest of the public at large in order to satisfy the “public interest test” as set out in whistleblowing legislation, and can concern only a small group of people.
Where an employee admits to misconduct, it may be reasonable for an employer to limit its investigation into the situation.
Receive our monthly employment law newsletter and invitations to our events!
Copyright © Brahams Dutt Badrick French LLP | Cookies & Privacy Policy | Legal Notices | Fees Information | Complaints Procedure