
A Guide to the Employment Rights Act 2025
The Employment Rights Act 2025 (the ERA) became law on 18 December 2025 and will make sweeping and significant reforms to our employment law landscape

The Employment Rights Act 2025 (the ERA) became law on 18 December 2025 and will make sweeping and significant reforms to our employment law landscape

In Augustine v Data Cars Ltd the Supreme Court has made it easier for part-time workers to complain about being treated less favourably than a

In AB v GH Limited the EAT has clarified how consent and intoxication affect whether sexual conduct is ‘unwanted’ for harassment purposes. Consent is an

On 30 July 2026, the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS) published a revised draft of their Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures

In Wolfe v Taka Mayfair Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has considered whether the right to be accompanied at a meeting applies where an

From 1 October 2026, employers will become obliged to conduct ‘right to work’ checks on a wider range of individuals, extending beyond those who have

LUNCHTIME WEBINAR – 22 September 2026 From 1 January 2027, the unfair dismissal landscape will change significantly. More employees will be able to bring claims,

BDBF has been shortlisted for Employment Team of the Year at the prestigious Chambers UK Solicitor Awards 2026. These awards recognise the very best of the

BDBF, the market-leading employment and partnership law boutique, is pleased to welcome Abi Harindra as a new associate. Abi brings valuable experience advising both employers

On 1 January 2027, the period of service needed to claim unfair dismissal will be reduced from two years to six months. At the same

On 8 July 2026, the Government launched a consultation on options for regulating the use of workplace monitoring technologies. The proposals range from issuing guidance

On 14 July 2026, the Government opened a consultation aimed at informing a “comprehensive reform of the current equal pay framework”, seeking views on gaps

In Geeks Ltd v Watts the Court of Appeal (CA) has ruled that a clawback provision for training-related costs was an unlawful, and therefore unenforceable,