
Frequent sickness absence caused by disability requires a lighter touch
The EAT has given guidance on how an employer should respond to numerous intermittent sickness absences of an employee with a disability.
The EAT has given guidance on how an employer should respond to numerous intermittent sickness absences of an employee with a disability.
The Supreme Court has added to the raft of cases concerning whether staff in the gig economy are workers or genuinely self-employed.
An employee who was dismissed for failing to provide evidence of his right to work should have been given the right to appeal against his dismissal.
The Government has published its response to the Women and Equalities Committee recent report.
The High Court has confirmed that an entire agreements clause can defeat a claim for misrepresentation.
The High Court has clarified the scope of an employer’s duty when giving a reference in respect of a former employee.
The EAT has made clear that context is key to the determination of whether conduct amounts to harassment.
The Court of Appeal has set out what an employer does and does not need to know in order to be found to have discriminated against a disabled employee.
The Court of Appeal has considered the circumstances in which an employer will be held liable for acts of discrimination committed by their agents.
The Supreme Court has confirmed that a contract can validly prohibit variations being made to it orally.
The EAT has clarified the circumstances in which an employee can fairly be dismissed for gross misconduct.
What are the rules on recording employee communications in financial services firms? In 2017, the FCA announced an increase in the number of financial services
Receive our monthly employment law newsletter and invitations to our events!
Copyright © Brahams Dutt Badrick French LLP | Cookies & Privacy Policy | Legal Notices | Fees Information | Complaints Procedure