
High Court considers legal advice privilege regarding intra-client communications
In Aabar Holdings SARL v Glencore plc EWHC 877 (Comm) the High Court found that legal advice privilege can apply to communications between internal members

In Aabar Holdings SARL v Glencore plc EWHC 877 (Comm) the High Court found that legal advice privilege can apply to communications between internal members

The EAT’s recent decision in Tarbuc v Martello Piling Ltd clarifies the scope and limits of the protected conversation regime under s.111A of the Employment

The Employment Tribunal’s reserved judgment in Crawford-Thomas v Collinson (Central Services) Limited offers a useful reminder that a genuine business case for redundancy is not,

In Dixon v GlobalData plc the High Court awarded a former employee approximately £442,000 in equitable compensation after his employer reneged on assurances that his

On 29 April 2026, the Victims and Courts Act 2026 was given Royal Assent, sealing it in final form and securing the protections intended to

Under the Employment Rights Act 2025, employers will be prohibited from using non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to prevent disclosure of information relating to harassment or discrimination.

In Kankanalapalli v Loesche Energy Systems Ltd, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) confirmed that a binding contract may be formed before employment starts. Standard conditions

The Department for Business and Trade has launched a wide-ranging review of the TUPE regulations. Employers have until 1 July 2026 to make their voices

On 8 April 2026, the Government published its response to the completed consultation on the new rights of trade unions to access workplaces, as well

Various employment law changes are coming into force in April 2026. Our at-a-glance guide rounds them up and also links to BDBF briefings where you

In April 2026, increases will be made to the maximum compensation limits for certain Employment Tribunal awards, and to statutory pay and national minimum wage

In Madden v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, the Employment Tribunal concluded that an employee with ADHD was unfairly dismissed and discriminated against for