
BDBF Webinar – Culture wars at work: Navigating employee rights, beliefs and the law
In this 45-minute webinar, BDBF Managing Associate Jamie Barton and Knowledge Lawyer Rose Lim discuss the latest legal developments in an era of rapid social

In this 45-minute webinar, BDBF Managing Associate Jamie Barton and Knowledge Lawyer Rose Lim discuss the latest legal developments in an era of rapid social

In Cunningham v BBC the EAT has held that an employer had enough information to have known that an employee with type 2 diabetes was

In Chandrashekarappa v Wipro Ltd the Employment Appeal Tribunal considered whether an employee was entitled to full payment of a promised bonus in circumstances where

As of 19 June 2026, data controllers – including employers – must have a data protection complaints process that meets the requirements set out in

On 9 June 2026, the Department for Business and Trade launched a consultation on potential new employment rights for unpaid carers and parents of seriously

LUNCHTIME WEBINAR – 7 July 2026 In an era of rapid social change and escalating “culture wars”, employers are facing increased challenges in balancing competing

On 16 June 2026, BDBF Partner Nick Wilcox will be speaking at the 7th Annual IFSEA International Conference in London. His session, entitled “Preventing Sexual

On 10 June 2026, BDBF Partner Samantha Prosser will be speaking at “Our BIG Problem, Our Solutions – Wellness at Work” – a Midland Ophthalmological

Can Blair’s 1997 employment law reforms help the sector prepare for the seismic changes coming with the Employment Rights Act? In this episode of The

In Aabar Holdings SARL v Glencore plc EWHC 877 (Comm) the High Court found that legal advice privilege can apply to communications between internal members

The EAT’s recent decision in Tarbuc v Martello Piling Ltd clarifies the scope and limits of the protected conversation regime under s.111A of the Employment

The Employment Tribunal’s reserved judgment in Crawford-Thomas v Collinson (Central Services) Limited offers a useful reminder that a genuine business case for redundancy is not,