
Reform promises to “repeal” the Equality Act 2010 on Day 1 if elected.
On 17 February 2026, Reform Party MP Suella Braverman announced that her party planned to repeal the Equality Act 2010 on the first day of

On 17 February 2026, Reform Party MP Suella Braverman announced that her party planned to repeal the Equality Act 2010 on the first day of

In Halstead v JD Wetherspoons plc, the Employment Tribunal has considered whether an employer failed to make reasonable adjustments to their processes and the way

In this 1-hour webinar, BDBF Principal Knowledge Lawyer Amanda Steadman and Senior Associate Connie Berry explore the key legal pitfalls to avoid in redundancy exercises

In Kokomane v Boots Management Services Ltd the EAT has underlined that workers may be protected from victimisation where they raise complaints which do not

A senior executive missed out on a valuable LTIP award after the rules were amended by his ex-employer’s parent company. He alleged the changes amounted

BDBF represents Mr Lapinski in a claim for disability discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 brought against Triton Investment Advisers LLP and several individual respondents,

In the case of For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers the Supreme Court was tasked with determining the interpretation of “woman” in the

Is a disabled employee’s use of abusive and offensive language towards colleagues a sufficient ground to justify dismissal where there is a link between the

In the recent case of Eddie Stobart Ltd v Graham, the EAT overturned an Employment Tribunal’s award of £10,000 for injury to feelings for an

New Acas guidance on neurodiversity highlights the importance of fostering inclusive workplaces that support workers with conditions like ADHD, autism, dyslexia, and dyspraxia. By understanding

What is the background law? The Equality Act 2010 protects individuals from discrimination because of religion and belief, which encompasses the manifestation of such beliefs.

In a recent case the Employment Tribunal held that a dismissal was unfair and discriminatory despite significant periods of sickness absence. While the Tribunal found